Blockbuster's Downfall

A Cautionary Tale of Standing Still in a Moving Market

Companies that have failed to go uphill have invariably gone downhill.

Philip Fisher

Once a titan of the entertainment industry, Blockbuster's journey from video rental giant to bankruptcy serves as a stark reminder of Philip Fisher's wisdom: "Companies that have failed to go uphill have invariably gone downhill."

Blockbuster's story begins with innovation. Founded in 1985, the company revolutionized the video rental industry with its vast selection and convenient locations. At its peak in 2004, Blockbuster boasted over 9,000 stores worldwide and a market value of $5 billion. But as the saying goes, the only constant in life is change, and Blockbuster's failure to embrace this truth would prove to be its undoing.

The company's decline wasn't due to a lack of opportunities to innovate. In 2000, Reed Hastings, the founder of a fledgling company called Netflix, approached Blockbuster with an offer to handle their online business. Blockbuster's leadership, comfortable in their market dominance, declined. It's like they were offered a sturdy umbrella on a sunny day and said, "No thanks, it never rains here."

But the storm was coming. As Netflix grew and the digital revolution gained momentum, Blockbuster clung to its brick-and-mortar model. They were like a horse-and-buggy business watching automobiles zoom by, insisting that people would always prefer the charm of a horse-drawn carriage.

Blockbuster's failure to go uphill wasn't just about missing the streaming revolution. It was about a fundamental misunderstanding of their own business. They saw themselves as a video rental company when they should have seen themselves as being in the home entertainment business. This myopia prevented them from fully embracing new technologies that could have secured their future.

Blockbuster was standing still on an escalator that was moving down. To maintain their position, let alone improve it, they needed to climb. Instead, they stood pat, confident in their footing, not realizing that standing still meant going backwards.

The company made belated attempts to catch up. In 2004, they finally eliminated late fees, a major customer pain point. In 2008, they launched a streaming service. But by then, it was too little, too late. It's like trying to bail out a sinking ship with a teaspoon – the effort was there, but the execution was woefully inadequate.

Blockbuster's downfall teaches us a crucial lesson about the nature of business and innovation. In a rapidly changing world, companies can't afford to rest on their laurels. Success isn't a destination; it's a journey that requires constant effort and adaptation.

Fisher's quote reminds us that in business, as in life, you're either growing or you're dying. There's no standing still. It's like riding a bicycle – the moment you stop pedaling, you start to wobble.

For investors, Blockbuster's story underscores the importance of looking beyond current performance to a company's ability to innovate and adapt. It's not just about the products a company makes today, but about its vision for tomorrow.

In the end, Blockbuster's tale is a poignant reminder that success can be the enemy of innovation. It's a call to constantly examine our assumptions and be willing to disrupt ourselves before someone else does. Because in the ever-evolving world of business, if you're not going uphill, you're inevitably sliding down.

Reply

or to participate.